LITTLE NOTES1998December November October September July/August June May April March February
ARTICLES
Letters |
May 1998 LITTLE NOTES
THE EDITORIAL CARTOON by Jeff Danziger that ran March 19 in the San Diego Union-Tribune was a reaction to the Holy See's release three days earlier of We Remember: A Reflection on the Shoah. ("Shoah" is the Jewish term for the Holocaust.) The 4000-word document apologizes for any Catholic complicity with anti-Semitism, calls on Catholics to repent of all expressions or feelings of anti-Semitism, and documents the support Pope Pius XII provided to the Jewish community during World War II. Some Jewish leaders and Church critics said it didn't go far enough."At the time, I didn't have a piece on this from either a Jewish or Catholic perspective, so I wanted to run something on it," Bernie Jones, the U-T opinion page editor, told News Notes in mid-April. Jones said that he was aware that the current pope has been active in attempting to bring Catholics and Jews together. "The role of an opinion piece is to make a point," Jones said. "That [the cartoon] was one side. Normally, I do try to run something on the other side of an issue if there is an opportunity to do so." Jones did not read the Vatican document in question prior to his decision to run the cartoon. "I read 17 to 18 hours a day now," he said, explaining he didn't have time for in-depth study of every topic dealt with on the opinion pages. Still, he considered himself "probably as well-versed as anyone outside the issue." Jones's reading on the topic was limited to secular newspapers and news services, such as the New York Times and the Washington Post. Asked whether he had ever run cartoons caricaturing religious leaders from non-Christian religions -- such as a Jewish rabbi, a Muslim imam, or a Hindu priest -- Jones said the only one he could recall in recent times was one involving Jewish rabbis, which dealt with the tensions between Orthodox Jews and more liberal forms of Judaism. "This [cartoon] was not, in my opinion, something that specifically addressed Catholicism," Jones said. "It addresses the Church's role during a historical period." Would he run similar cartoons in the future? He said it depended on what comes up in the news. -- A.K. During her trial, held in North County Municipal Court in Vista, Mudry was represented by attorney James McElroy, who has a long history of pursuing legal action against local pro-lifers. (See News Notes, March 1994, April 1996, and January 1997.) Mudry's defense: she poured dye on the aborted baby photos so that children wouldn't be offended by them. In court, Mudry said she couldn't remember whether she had actually attacked Youngkin. It was a defense eerily similar to that of another McElroy client, Kathleen Gregory, in a suit she brought against Youngkin and Troy Newman in January 1996, for picketing an abortionist's office. In that case, Gregory claimed in court that, because she is manic-depressive, she couldn't recall some of her violent actions toward the pro-life picketers, which had been caught on videotape. Gregory's suit was unsuccessful Youngkin's attorney Rick Vattuone told News Notes Mudry should also have been charged with assault and battery, since the caustic dye she used in the attack was dumped not only on Youngkin's sign but on her person as well. Vattuone also observed that, under existing "hate crime" laws, Mudry could have been charged with a religious hate crime, since Youngkin and Brock were holding literature of a religious nature. "I think this is an example of increasing violence by militant pro-abortionists against peaceful, law-abiding, pro-life picketers," he said. Mudry's guilty verdict was returned by the jury in a half hour. Her sentencing is scheduled for May 11, 8:15 a.m. at the Vista courthouse. -- A.K. In opposition to Lungren, Bill Ainsworth, the U-T reporter who wrote the piece, quoted from the "updated catechism, issued last year" which says the death penalty should be "very rare, if practically non-existent." Ainsworth quoted Father Ron Pachence, director of the Institute for Christian Ministries at USD, who said the church has long opposed the death penalty as part of its "'seamless garment' doctrine, which holds that all life is sacred" and is "the basis for the Catholic Church's opposition to abortion, the death penalty, and assisted suicide." The "seamless garment" is not doctrine but "a product of [the late] Cardinal [Joseph] Bernardin," says Karl Keating of the local apologetics group Catholic Answers. "It's...a political construct. It's not incumbent upon a Catholic to buy into that at all." Keating explains the Church's stance: "The death penalty may be imposed, but it's a prudential judgment as to whether it should be imposed in particular circumstances. On that question, Catholics can differ. Church teaching stops at the point of saying the death penalty may be inflicted if it is necessary to protect society. After that point, the Church doesn't give us any means to weigh prudentially how this would go. It is not correct to say that the Catholic teaching is that the death penalty should not be imposed. That's certainly not been the teaching of the Church historically." Why did Ainsworth quote only Father Pachence as a spokesman -- and an inaccurate one -- for the Catholic view? "It was one of those things that came up so quickly that I just went with whatever source I could find." News Notes asked why he didn't contact the local diocese. "I heard that the bishop doesn't talk to the press," Ainsworth said. Told that Bernadeane Carr, the diocesan communications director, is often quoted in his newspaper, Ainsworth replied, "I don't know who she is, but I'm new to San Diego and this paper." -- E.G. During the question and answer period, White brandished a copy of the U-T piece on Lungren and said, "I'm outraged by this." An 84-year-old nun in the front row said in all her years of Catholicism she had "never heard of the Church being for the death penalty." Asked by a News Notes reporter if it is possible to forgive and still be for the death penalty, Pelke responded in part, "Maybe you can have forgiveness and be for the death penalty, but you can't have compassion for humanity and still be a supporter of the death penalty." Pastor Ronald Hebert, who did not attend the presentation, told News Notes, "They asked my permission to make a presentation and, because of the Church's interest in the matter, I said yes. They were allowed to come because the church is looking at that question and more and more moving towards an ever-stronger stance against the death penalty." -- E.G. "Since the Action Fund's beginning seven years ago," the questionnaire states, "our success has stemmed largely from identifying pro-choice voters, and then educating them about the candidates' views through our Pro-Choice Voter's Guide." According to Mary Ellen Hamilton, VP of community affairs for the local Planned Parenthood, the PP Action Fund has distributed the questionnaires for six years to all candidates for public office who garner at least five percent of the vote. The decision whether or not to survey candidates is made by each local Planned Parenthood organization. Hamilton said PP has not supported local candidates because elections would be unwinnable against pro-life incumbents such as U.S. Congressmen Duncan Hunter, Ron Packard, and Duke Cunningham. The local PP Action Fund does not endorse candidates and considers itself bipartisan. In the event of a race between a staunchly "pro-choice" candidate and a staunchly "anti-choice" candidate in a tight race, Hamilton admitted, "We could become more active." Such was the case in the March 10 special election for the seat left vacant by the death of Democratic Congressman Walter Capps in California's 22nd Congressional District (San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara). The candidates were Capps's widow, Lois, who supports partial-birth abortion, and Republican pro-lifer Tom Bordonaro. According to Mary Ellen McCaffrey, chairman of the California Right to Life political action committee, PP contributed $90,000 to Capps, who outspent Bordonaro by a 2-1 margin. Capps also received $100,000 from the National Abortion Rights Action League, as well as support from labor unions, including the teachers' unions, and the American Association of Retired Persons. Capps won the election with 53 percent of the vote to Bordonaro's 44 percent. Florentino's response to the survey: she faxed back to Planned Parenthood the cover of a pamphlet called "Is This a Choice? Or a Child?" which carries a photo of an unborn child and a quote from Thomas Jefferson: "The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction is the first and only legitimate object of good government." -- A.K. |