LITTLE NOTES1999December November October September July/August June May April March February January
ARTICLES
Letters |
May 1999 LITTLE NOTES
PRO-LIFERS WERE UNABLE to picket abortionist David Priver when they showed up in a Point Loma neighborhood on February 20, because, they learned from his old neighbor, he had moved months earlier. Undeterred, twelve pro-lifers picketed him for and hour and a half two months later, Saturday, April 24, on the sidewalks outside his new residence in a high-rise condominium complex at 500 West Harbor Drive (corner of Harbor and Market Streets), near the San Diego convention center. Priver has served on the board of Planned Parenthood and was president of the San Diego County Medical Society in 1997. In an ad he placed in the June 24, 1998 National Coalition of Abortion Providers newsletter, he claimed to have performed more than 20,000 abortions.The first City of San Diego police officer arrived on the scene about 20 minutes after the protest started and told one participant that the picketers were well within their rights. The officer mentioned that the condo complex management had complained about the picketing and were concerned about the right to privacy. The policeman said he told them that the picketers had every right to be there, as long as they stayed on public property. He left after a few minutes. One resident of Priver's highrise emerged on her balcony to yell at and lift her shirt at the protestors. Another area resident took a picketer to task for forcing his 12-year-old child to participate in his activism. His son commented, "I don't care; I've been doing this since I was five." One woman poured water on three picketers from her balcony and called two of the picketers "a couple of fat, ugly women." When a second San Diego police officer showed up at the picket a little later, picketers informed him of the incident. After he enumerated the rules for residential picketing to the protesters, he entered the complex. Four police cruisers (three from the San Diego Police Department and one from the Harbor Police) appeared during the protest. One picketer recounted a portion of his conversation with the first SDPD officer who showed up: "He [the police officer] said, 'Oh, I knew you were going to be here.' 'Oh, really?' I said. 'I didn't tell anybody.' He said, 'Well, we knew you were going to be here; I was told you were going to be here.' 'So how did you know?' 'We have our investigative units discover things like this.'"
Excerpts from the bishop's memo: "Vatican II and postconciliar documents have led to recognizing the priority of the eucharist celebrated over the eucharist reserved and to appreciating that eucharistic devotion should be seen as flowing from and back to the Mass, while never in competition with it. Consequently, the altar of sacrifice is to be the primary focal point in every church and the reserved eucharist is to be located either "in a chapel suited to the faithful's private adoration and prayer" or "at an altar or elsewhere, in keeping with local custom, and in a part of the church that is worthy and properly adorned" (General Instruction of the Roman Missal, no. 276).... "Postconciliar reform has sought to correct a preconciliar imbalance in which eucharistic reservation and veneration was given emphasis at the expense of eucharistic celebration, but, now just the reverse seems to be happening.... The place of eucharistic reservation, whether a chapel or otherwise, should be visually and proportionately located in relation to the altar of sacrifice without competing with it; it should be seen as distinct but inseparable from the place of eucharistic celebration and should not be completely separated from it; it should not be located behind the majority of the assembly. A chapel of eucharistic reservation, moreover, should be easily identified and readily accessible; it should be suitable for private adoration and prayer and should not be used for any other reason...."
Guideline number seven of the document states: "The pastor and Director/Coordinator of Religious Education will require a periodic progress report to be made by the home schooling parents." The tenth point says that only "approved textbooks" are to be used; San Diego does not carry Baltimore Catechism or Ignatius Press' Faith and Life series on its approved list; both are used by most Catholic homeschoolers. In the greater Los Angeles area, the guidelines have caused confusion among home schoolers. Jim Bendell, an attorney with Roman Catholic Faithful who is also a home schooling father of two, said he found it ironic that the Los Angeles Archdiocese's religious education department was issuing guidelines for home schoolers: "we are talking about a diocese that holds an annual religious education conference where every major dissenter is given a forum." One home schooling leader told a reporter: "I just feel so sad that these undue burdens are being placed on parents by the Church in Los Angeles...we look to the Church for support. I wonder why they are doing this to us. We are raising children in an already hostile environment. The Church should be our helper and our support."
On April 19 AB 804 was tabled for "this session." |